Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Alan Skipper's avatar

I 100% agree with everything you say in this article. However, as an offense, withholding intimacy should be considered on par with cheating. In both cases, intimacy isn’t being shared where it was vowed to be shared, and the result is that the relationship suffers.

It makes no sense to consider a partner who starves the other partner as somehow more noble when a relationship ultimately fails, if the partner who’s being starved has done everything possible to get the other partner to pursue greater intimacy.

Both partners are equally guilty for the failure of the relationship…certainly the one who cheated for breaking the rules, but the other for creating the conditions by not fully participating, not listening, not being completely invested, accusing, blaming, and otherwise tearing down the other person and ultimately the relationship.

Wounds are real and they don’t always heal on their own. We’re all wounded, and intimacy is the salve for our wounds. It’s wrong to break a vow in search of healing, but it’s just as wrong to compound the pain of the wounded partner by shaming them, rejecting them, and by withholding intimacy…whether physical or emotional.

Expand full comment
Canuckto's avatar

Relationships are immoral and it's a false sense of commitment.

Expand full comment

No posts

Ready for more?